|
| |
Religio-political rhetoric: tempting
but dangerous
Gene TeSelle reviews an important article on the tensions between
democracy and religious absolutism
[2-9-01]
Senator Joseph Lieberman, the Jewish equivalent of a
born-again politician, notoriously said that the Constitution guarantees
"freedom of religion, not freedom from religion."
Even President George W. Bush knows better than that;
he has declared his "commitment to pluralism--not discriminating
for or against Methodists or Mormons or Muslims, or good people of no
faith at all." (How consistently that principle will be applied by
his Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives remains to be seen.)
That brings me to an important article that is
definitely worth reading--"Freedom From Religion: What's At Stake
in Faith-Based Politics," by Ellen Willis, a professor of
journalism at New York University. (It's in The Nation,
February 19, 2001. You can hear
an interview with Ellen Willis, about her article, on The Nation's
web site.)
Willis takes note of the widespread rhetoric that
religious organizations are "victims of a biased and rigid
secularism"; the pro-voucher argument that "nit-picking about
church and state should not stand in the way of educational
opportunities for poor black and Latino kids"; and the claim that
opposition to the sexual politics of conservative churches is
"tantamount to discrimination." Obviously she knows her way
around, and she has pondered the arguments of Richard John Neuhaus and
Stephen Carter that "a public role for religion is essential to
American democracy."
That's when she gets mad at the way Neuhaus excuses
the Christian Right as "an inevitable reaction to the relentlessly
antireligious program of the secular elite," and at the way Carter
accuses secularists of "trivializing" people's religious
convictions "by treating them as a matter of choice rather than an
absolute commitment."
"[I]n demanding that state and society defer to
the absolutism of religious devotion," she says, "Carter gives
the game away," exposing nothing less than a potential tension
between religion and democracy, more precisely, between the power of
religious conviction and a decent respect for the rights of dissenters
and minorities. The problem, she says, "is not that secularists are
antidemocratic but that democracy is antiabsolutist."
That's an important conceptual clarification, exposing
a widespread conceptual confusion or sleight-of-hand. It's one thing for
religious people to defend their rights; it's quite another thing for
them to demand "exemption from challenge to, or even criticism of,
their claim to a privileged role in shaping social values."
Now for another clarification. We have all heard (and
probably have all uttered) the argument that the absence of religion
creates a "vacuum" into which rush "the nightmarish
inversions and perversions of morality that characterized the
totalitarian secularisms of recent history."
That argument assumes, without logical, historical, or
psychological grounding, that morality depends upon religion. Anyone who
has taken Ethics 101 in college or seminary knows better than that--and
knows, in addition, that a typical strategy of conservative politicians
has been to encourage religion as an instrument of social stability and
even control.
Willis says provocatively, "it's as crucial to
defend secular culture as to preserve secular law." Why? "When
religion defines morality, the wall between church and state comes to be
seen as immoral."
Think about it. Engage in examination of conscience.
And listen for the subtle temptations lurking in the political rhetoric
we hear all around us.
|
| |
| |
|
If you like what
you find here,
we hope you'll help us keep Voices for Justice going ... and
growing!
Please consider making a special
contribution -- large or small -- to help us continue and improve
this service.
Click here to send a
gift online, using your credit card, through PayPal.
Or send your check, made
out to "Presbyterian Voices for Justice" and marked "web site," to
our PVJ Treasurer:
Darcy Hawk
4007 Gibsonia Road
Gibsonia, PA 15044-8312 |
| |
|
Some blogs worth visiting |
|
PVJ's
Facebook page
Mitch Trigger, PVJ's
Secretary/Communicator, has created a Facebook page where
Witherspoon members and others can gather to exchange news and
views. Mitch and a few others have posted bits of news, both
personal and organizational. But there’s room for more!
You can post your own news and views,
or initiate a conversation about a topic of interest to you. |
| |
|
Voices of Sophia blog
Heather Reichgott, who has created
this new blog for Voices of Sophia, introduces it:
After fifteen years of scholarship
and activism, Voices of Sophia presents a blog. Here, we present the
voices of feminist theologians of all stripes: scholars, clergy,
students, exiles, missionaries, workers, thinkers, artists, lovers
and devotees, from many parts of the world, all children of the God
in whose image women are made. .... This blog seeks to glorify God
through prayer, work, art, and intellectual reflection. Through
articles and ensuing discussion we hope to become an active and
thoughtful community. |
| |
|
John Harris’ Summit to
Shore blogspot
Theological and philosophical
reflections on everything between summit to shore, including
kayaking, climbing, religion, spirituality, philosophy, theology,
politics, culture, travel, The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), New
York City and the Queens neighborhood of Ridgewood by a progressive
New York City Presbyterian Pastor. John is a former member of the
Witherspoon board, and is designated pastor of North Presbyterian
Church in Flushing, NY. |
| |
|
John Shuck’s Shuck and Jive
A Presbyterian minister, currently
serving as pastor of First Presbyterian Church of Elizabethton,
Tenn., blogs about spirituality, culture, religion (both organized
and disorganized), life, evolution, literature, Jesus, and
lightening up. |
| |
|
Got more blogs to recommend?
Please
send a note, and we'll see what we can do! |
| |
|