|
| |
|
Authoritative advice on preparing overtures
In a note dated September 3, 1999, the
Constitutional Services Department of the Office of the General Assembly offered
this advice (which does not "constitute rulings or authoritative
interpretations") for anyone interested in preparing and presenting an
overture to the General Assembly.
Our thanks to Fred Jenkins, who prepared
this note, and to Mary Ruth Phares, who manages the PCUSA POLITY REFLECTIONS
meeting on PresbyNet. It is presented here with their permission.

SUBJECT: OVERTURES TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
REFERENCE: G-11.0103t(3), G-13.0112c, G-18.0301
PRESENTATION OF OVERTURES:
The ground rules for presenting overtures are found in the Manual of the
General Assembly, Standing Rules B.5.c. (Page 5 in 1999 Manual of the General
Assembly). The key provisions are that:
Overtures must be submitted by vote of a presbytery or a synod. A session may
start the process by presenting a proposed overture to the presbytery. Anyone
with standing to make a motion may initiate an overture, subject to the local
rules for submitting new business.
Overtures shall request the General Assembly to take a particular action or
approve or endorse a particular statement or resolution.
An overture proposing an amendment to the Constitution must be
submitted to the Stated Clerk 120 days before the General Assembly convenes .
Deadlines for overtures on any another subject:
 | 60 days before GA: overtures having financial implications for current or
future budgets. (SRB.5.c.(2)) |
 | 60 days before GA: overtures to be published in the RGAs (Reports to the
General Assembly) mailed to commissioners. |
 | 45 days before GA: Final deadline for the current GA, postmark determines.
|
Overtures not received within the time limits shall be returned to the
sender.
Presbytery shall appoint someone to be available to provide information on
the overture. See the paper on Overture Advocacy.
ASSISTANCE IN PREPARATION:
Most overtures can be strengthened by reviewing prior actions and policy
statements of the Assembly. Those who are drafting overtures concerning the
Church's social witness can consult the Advice and Counsel Group of the
Committee on Social Witness Policy.
Overtures and commissioner resolutions on social issues are reviewed by the
Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy, the Advocacy Committee on Racial
Ethnic Concerns, and the Advocacy Committee for Women's Concerns prior to and
during assemblies. Each has access to commissioners through Advice and Counsel
Memos. Authors of overtures and overture advocates will find it helpful to
consult these offices before and during the Assembly.
The Department of Constitutional Services in the Office of the General
Assembly is prepared to help those who are drafting overtures to amend the
Constitution.
WRITING AN OVERTURE:
There is no rule that says an overture will be rejected for being in bad
form. Carefully following the standard form has several advantages: The drafters
are reminded to include certain necessary information; The reader will know the
paper is an Overture and not something else; It saves time for the editors in
the Office of the General Assembly who must convert it to a standard form so
that General Assembly commissioners receive action items and background
materials organized for clarity and convenience. The standard outline, {with
comments on the parts}:
TITLE: O V E R T U R E
{If you submit by photocopying something from a session or a committee,
please mask out extraneous material and tell us boldly this is an Overture.}
CAPTION:
{OGA will give the overture a number in order of receipt. The caption is a
brief description. If the sender does not include it, a caption will be
supplied by OGA.}
ACTION DESIRED:
The Presbytery [or Synod] ...respectfully overtures the nnn General Assembly
(yyy) to:
{Be specific. For amendments to the Book of Order indicate the paragraph,
section number and the words to be added or stricken from the text. Sometimes
presbyteries send the Stated Clerk a draft for comment as part of the
preparation. Mask out words that may leave the reader in doubt whether the
governing body is finished with it and intends the General Assembly to take it
seriously.}
RATIONALE:
{Overtures are generally written in short paragraphs, often telegraphic and
expressing one thought. A simple outline would be, to begin by stating the
problem and move toward the solution. Tell the reader what is the problem,
what is the harm, why is the current rule/program not adequate, what is
needed.}
SIGNATURE:
{The stated clerk should sign and date the Overture to certify its
authenticity as an action of the governing body.}
{NOTE: This format was adopted in 1999.}

SUBMITTING THE OVERTURE
The OGA needs a hard copy of the overture, signed and dated by the stated
clerk, or a cover letter certifying the overture.
A change in presbytery boundaries, or moving a church from one presbytery to
another requires action by both presbyteries and the synod, or both synods. This
may be submitted as three separate overtures or in a single overture that
recites the dates when each governing body voted to approve. Treat a change in
boundaries as you would an amendment to a paragraph. Repeat the entire
description of the boundaries of the presbytery as amended.
If possible, please accompany the hard copy with a copy on disk. WordPerfect
is the preferred software, but others may be accepted. Address email to kaym@ctr.pcusa.org.
RESPONSES TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS:
- If the presbytery agrees with the rationale and the action of an overture
adopted by another presbytery, OGA encourages concurrence to save time and
paper. It also saves time, when similar overtures are received, comparing
the like overtures, and having to contact presbytery to see if presbytery is
willing to concur with a similar overture.
- The deadline for concurring with an overture is the same as that for
submitting an overture.
- A presbytery that concurs with the overture of another presbytery still
has the right to send an overture advocate to assist in presenting the
matter.
- "Communications" mentioned in the Standing Rules are not a means
for a session or individual to present a proposal that might otherwise be an
overture from a presbytery. These are received only from entities of the
General Assembly or from "organizations which have no regular access to
the General Assembly through established procedures."
DEADLINES FOR SUBMISSION:
 | 214th GA (2002): June 15-22, 2002
120 days February 15;60 days April 16; 45 days May 1 |
|
| |
| |
|
If you like what
you find here,
we hope you'll help us keep Voices for Justice going ... and
growing!
Please consider making a special
contribution -- large or small -- to help us continue and improve
this service.
Click here to send a
gift online, using your credit card, through PayPal.
Or send your check, made
out to "Presbyterian Voices for Justice" and marked "web site," to
our PVJ Treasurer:
Darcy Hawk
4007 Gibsonia Road
Gibsonia, PA 15044-8312 |
| |
|
Some blogs worth visiting |
|
PVJ's
Facebook page
Mitch Trigger, PVJ's
Secretary/Communicator, has created a Facebook page where
Witherspoon members and others can gather to exchange news and
views. Mitch and a few others have posted bits of news, both
personal and organizational. But there’s room for more!
You can post your own news and views,
or initiate a conversation about a topic of interest to you. |
| |
|
Voices of Sophia blog
Heather Reichgott, who has created
this new blog for Voices of Sophia, introduces it:
After fifteen years of scholarship
and activism, Voices of Sophia presents a blog. Here, we present the
voices of feminist theologians of all stripes: scholars, clergy,
students, exiles, missionaries, workers, thinkers, artists, lovers
and devotees, from many parts of the world, all children of the God
in whose image women are made. .... This blog seeks to glorify God
through prayer, work, art, and intellectual reflection. Through
articles and ensuing discussion we hope to become an active and
thoughtful community. |
| |
|
John Harris’ Summit to
Shore blogspot
Theological and philosophical
reflections on everything between summit to shore, including
kayaking, climbing, religion, spirituality, philosophy, theology,
politics, culture, travel, The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), New
York City and the Queens neighborhood of Ridgewood by a progressive
New York City Presbyterian Pastor. John is a former member of the
Witherspoon board, and is designated pastor of North Presbyterian
Church in Flushing, NY. |
| |
|
John Shuck’s Shuck and Jive
A Presbyterian minister, currently
serving as pastor of First Presbyterian Church of Elizabethton,
Tenn., blogs about spirituality, culture, religion (both organized
and disorganized), life, evolution, literature, Jesus, and
lightening up. |
| |
|
Got more blogs to recommend?
Please
send a note, and we'll see what we can do! |
| |
|